MP3 comparison chart of two encoders
UPDATES:
Following a series of upconvertions adn other experiments that itme i have found soem other peuliarities that are main to Musicmatch:
- UPconverting monophonic bit rates to stereo bit rates can cause stereo widening of these monoral audios. The lowest stereo mode i found or used was the 24 kbps
- UPconverting to higher bandwidths may cause / produce 'reaction /reactance carriers' . For example a 8 kb ( of 8 kHz) upconverted to 24 kb cana cause ahigher freq whistle to be heard, that can be soemtiems very annoying. please notic that this does not only happen between MP3 converions but also to convert one WAV file of 32 kHz to an MP3 file of 44 kHz bandwidth . There was indeed one reactance carrier of ca 16 kHz . The problem for this case has been corected with the usage of Xing encoder
- Some low rate ( such as 8/8 , 8/11 and 16/11 ) MP2-layer 3 files seem to use a 8 bit audio resolution. Using 8 bit resolution WAVS to converting to MP1 ( above 64 kb rtates at leat ) can cauise the MP3 files to have the half sixe!!
- As you can see from the frequwncy responses tables there is soem important information that shows a nrealy direct relation of bandwidth and compression And here is a over simplified relation.Notice trhat : any freqs above this band-stop are sharply removed Onfo is for Musimatch with slight improvement on Xing for the theoretical noise example
- One very important point when using players with low bit rates. It is very important to disable Doirect X from the player otherwise audio will be strongly salloivnetai
160kbit - 44 kHz gives a 20 kHz bandwidth
128 kbit -44 kHz gives a 16 kHz bandwidth
96 kbit - 44 kHz gives a 11.8 kHz bandwidth
MPEG 1
64 kbit - 22 kHz gives a 10.4 kHz bandwidth
48 kbit - 22 kHz gives a
6 kHz bandwidth
32 kbit - 22 kHz gives a 5,2 kHz bandwidth
16 kbit -11 kHz gives a .4.7 kHz bandwidth
8 kbit -8/11 kHz gives a 3.3 kHz
bandwidth MPEG 2
Following a long period of
digitizing my music collection into MP3 I have
also experimented with two different popular encoders and below you
will find some very
important results:
The experiments are two
based upon a standard
method .( tones and white noise)
Program for making these is CoolEdit Pro (trial) with trial MP3 plug in
(read only)
Step A Making the files
A 1:
Tones produced are : 3 secs each tone , 0 db level , with the following frequencies ( all are Hz)
- 1000
- 5000
- 7000
- 9000
- 13000
- 14000
- 15000
- 15500
- 16000
- 18000
- 19000
and saved as WAV 44.000. mono , 16 bit resolution
A 2
Making white noise again
under CoolEdit with:
1 sec blank
3 secs stereo white noise of 0 db level
1 sec blank
with 48000 kHz , 16 bit resolution
Step 2- compressing
Using the two compression programs
( Music match 5 and Xing encoder 2.1) step
by step in various compression levels :
VBR - 160 – 128 – 112 – 96-80- 64- 56-48-32-16- 8 then save
each
produced file by compression – name
All files are then archived into a ziped file for later
references
And here are some interesting and funny results ater zipping :
WAV files are expected to be compressed , nearly to the level of
standard Xing compression
Thed tone file was 34.560.444 bytes and zipped to 558960 bytes
But still , Xing , tone compression , seems to still compressed at high
rates . files of
abt 720 kb have been compressed to only 9200 kb! See below for more
Step 3- checking compressed files back on Cooledit – commentary
Cooledit pro has been again used for chacking the produced MP3 files . After loading files a smoothing process has been calculated ( RMS levels )
Part 1 the tone response
Very surprisingly both encoders shown
a ‘peculair’ attitude towards the pure tones
by producing faint signals of lower levels , up to –8 db .
Both compressors did not respond to tones above 17000
kHz leaving only
blank audio and ‘clicks’ between tone freq change
Music match 5 , shown a very
big number of faint signals ( about 15 .) nearly as it
happens with Xing encoder under VBR but levels were higher than of Xing
. There was only
the restriction of the bandwidth which nearly corresponds to the
compression rate . More
on this later
Xing however under 80-160 kb rates
produced very clear (
faint free ) tones . IN some cases upper freqs ( below 17kHz) shown
some ‘ripple’ ( on
off ) faint signals of very low levels some hundred Hz above the main
freq. VBR however
was relatively ‘dirty’ as shown in the table below ( levels of 40 db or
more
IN both encoders , tones of higher main freq. than bandwidth ( esp for rates below 48) produced mirror tones of 36 –40 db lower than main tone level
I have made also a try with WMA module of MM5 with results nearly of the MM-MP module
Part 2 the white noise response
While original signal was with exact edges between start and stop of noise, all MP compressed files shown a fade up and fade down of audio response ( either time or frequency domain ) as shown in the spectral view.
The table 3 shows the response of the 24kHz stereo white noise showing the decibel points
While Xing had the same audio level , MM5 had a 6 db loss
Xing also had nearly flat freq response at 99% of the spectrum while MM5 had a slow decrease response over higher freqs ( points shown )
Also 112- to 160 rates on Xing have the same response.. Though io could not see any significant differences in the spectrum alnalyzer of Cooledit, this can possibly lower the dynamic range .
MM in contrast shown a significant decrease of response dropping from 20 to 16 and 14 kHz for the 160 , 128 and 112 kb respectively ! Though playback on Winamp or MM player shows a 44 kHz range ….
Comparing to the response curves , in all cases except 16 Xing has higher response of 4-5 % than MM5
Special commentary on playback of the WAV tone file
Cooledit , as expected as
playing very clear the tones .
However direct connection of line out from the SB 128 to
the headphone
showed nearly no audio on freqs above 9000 Hz ( mismatch??)
In contrast to it the HIFI connected same way produced all the tones
till 19000 hz (
audible from the headphone output from HIFI )
Nullsoft’s Winamp 2.7 had a totally MP3 type audio (producing the
‘ghosts’or spur
tones as shown in the Xing )
Also Media player had the same ‘attitude’
In contrast to it real Player produced clear audio in all the tones !
Add on : Time rates for compressing a music file
The table is self explanatory. Notice
that this has been made last year when I used the
Pentium 133 with 64 Mb memory (which possibly does not matter on the
compression speed so
much )
The actual WAV/ PCM file is a song of 5 mins 27.86 sec
of a total 57.8 MB
size
First list shows the constant rate while second list shows variable
rate centered at 80 kb
and variations of the shown level
The 3rd list shows times produced with the MP 3 compressor
another program
capable to produce MP compatible WAV files ( it possibly uses the
Microsoft MP encoder) .
IT also produces 8 kb/8kHz files
LIST 1
Responses of clear tones on Xing encoder on various compressrion rates
| lo - nor Xing | Lo var Xing | Xing 160 , 128 112 96 and 80 kb | 64 | 56 | 48 | 32 | 16 | |
| 1000Hz | 12 ……….1000
-40……….5200 |
-38 ……….5100 ……….7220 ……….11500 |
3000 50000 7000 9000 11000 with -40 | 3000 5000 7000 /-47 9 000 1000/-50 |
3000/-36 5000 7000/-24 |
|||
| 5000 Hz | -42……….200 -32……….1200 -30 ……….2800 +12……….5000 -24……….7500
|
……….200 -32……….1100 -30……….2500 -25……….7500 -37……….10000 |
9000,
11, 13, 5 17, 19 21 kHz with –72 |
9000,
11, 13, 5 kHz with –72 |
9000,
11, 13, 5 kHz with –72 |
1000 3000 7000 9000 1000 ……….-36 | 3000 5000 7000 /-32 9 000 1000/-40 |
|
| 7000 hZ (+12) | -40……….200 -34……….700 -32……….2100 -44……….2600…. -22………4500… > -36……….12000 -38……….13200`14200 |
-32……….2100 -24……….4500 -18……….9100 -32……….11900 |
Clear | Clear | ||||
| 9000 Hz | -42……….700 -38……….1800 -30……….2700 -32……….4200 -20……….7500 -13……….11300 -30……….13900 -38……….15200…&##8230;….16100 |
……….500 ……….1900 ……….2900 ……….4900 -20……….6780 -15……….11200 |
15 and 21 kHz with-60 db | 15 with-60 db | - | 3000 ghost @-24 | 3000 ghhost/-24 | |
| 13000 | -38……….1000 -40……….1200 -30……….5800…𕢦….6800 -26……….8100 -14……….10700 -9……….15400 -26……….17800 -24……….19000 |
……….400 …… .1000 …….15600 -36.….3500 ……...3800 -32….5800 …….6200 -32….6800 -26….8200 …….8500 …….9100 -14….10600 |
Clear | Clear | Is cldear ( no signal) | 10000 ghost @-32 | ||
| 14000 | -40……….200 1200 2000
2800 48005200 10100 -32……….41200 -30……….6800 -24……….7800 .9200 > -13……….11800 -8……….16500 ……….15000 .15500 only for >30 -30….7800…8100 |
-72 with
2000 6000 10000 18000 20000kHz |
Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 9000 kHz ghost @-20 | 1000/-24 | ||
| 15000 | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 8500/-24 db ghost | 5000/-24 | ||||
| 15500 | Is cldear ( no signal ) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 8000 /-32 | 7000/-23 | 0/-24 | |||
| 16000 | Is cldear ( no signal ) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal ) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 7000 /-23 db | 8000……….30 | 1000/-24 |
| 18000 | Is cldear ( no signal ) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 5000/-24 db | 5000 ghost /-24 | 2000/-24 |
| 19000 | Is cldear ( no signal ) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | Is cldear ( no signal) | 4000/-24 db | 3000/-24 | |
| Lo - nor Xing | Lo var Xing | Xing 160 , 128 112 96 and 80 kb | 64 | 56 | 48 | 32 | 16 |
FILE SIZES
|
Rate |
Xing Size |
Xing Ziped |
|
16 |
71928 |
5159 |
|
32 |
143904 |
8748 |
|
48 |
215856 |
14533! |
|
56 |
252158 |
7722 |
|
64 |
288192 |
8263 |
|
96 |
432288 |
8151 |
|
112 |
504336 |
8653 |
|
128 |
576384 |
8947 |
|
160 |
720480 |
9227 |
|
LO NOR |
287296 |
216502 |
|
LO |
336871 |
274009 |
RESPONSES ON WHITE NOISE FOR MM5 AND XING ENCODERS
WAV FILE HAS
1 SEC BLANK – 3 SECS WHITE NOISE – 1 SEC BLANK
AUDIO LEVEL IS +3 DB
| Rate |
xing encoder |
M M 5 |
FILE SIZE XING |
| var low | -6 db<13.5kHz | 30864 | |
| var lo no | -6 db <18 -60 db 20 |
36027 | |
| var no | -6 db <19 -60 <20 |
42860 | |
| 160 | 0db <20 khz -38db/21. |
-2/2k -6/16k -11/ 20k |
100320 |
| 128 | Same | 2 to 6 up to 16 | 80256 |
| 112 | Same | -6 to 14k | 70224 |
| 96 | 0db <15………. -43/ 15,28 |
-6 /11.8 | 60192 |
| 80 | 0 <10.1 -6 /11.1 -36/11.2 |
constant to 11000 @-6 | 50400 |
| 64 | 0<3,4 -2 /10.3 -6 /10.8 -45/11.4 |
const to 10.4@-6 | 40320 |
| 56 | -6 /9.2 -45/9.6 |
-6 to 8.8 -60 /9.2 |
35280 |
| 48 | 0 -2 /3.4 -6/7.6 |
-6/6k -60/6.2 |
30096 |
| 32 | 0 -2/5.1 -60/5.5 |
-6 /5.2 -60/5.3 |
20160 |
| 20 | -6 /3.8 -60/3.9 |
||
| 16 | -6/4.0… -60/4.1 |
-6 /4.7 -60/4.8 |
10008 |
| 8 | -6/3.2 -60-/3.3 |
TABLE 3
Times compression ratios on A FILE
Using A 133 Mhz Pentium 1
file : wav 44 khz 16 bit size 57.834 kB 5:27.86 sec (327.86 sec)
Music Match 5 under
| Mode | Kb | Range | Fielsize | Comp rate | Time elapsed |
| 8 | 8kb | 11khz | 328 kB | 1/176 | 1:02 min |
| 16 | 16 | 11 | 656 | 88 | 1:19 |
| 18 | 18 | 11 | - | - | 1:22 |
| 64 | 64 | 22 | 2623 | 22 | 2.22 |
| 96 | 96 | 44 | ~3924 | 15 | 2:45 |
| 128 | 128 | 44 | 5246 | 11 | 2.51 |
~ estimated
| v 1% | 78-79 | 3222 | 18 | 2.49 | |
| 15% | 81 | 3366 | 17.1 | 2.46 | |
| 88% | 5982 | 9.6 | 3.00 |
mp3 compressor
| 16 | 16 | 657 | 89 | 1.43 | |
| 128 | 128 | 44 | - | >5 min |
No comments:
Post a Comment