The previous days I had a discussion with a
friend in a nearby place in the village and gave it to me for making a review . He bought it recently and used it for a
short time but had no problem to give it to me for a some further testing for publication to return it after a short time .
The box was
with full material: the radio inside a
leather box , the earphones a wound
antenna and a cable to be connected for
a supposedly ubiquitous as it is called (?)USB
charger . Also there was the
documentation a big paper of ca 80x60 cm
with all specs in a blitz with the rear side
showing the codes of the world in
a big map,seebelow for more
The radio has a very nice though quite narrow designed leather box for transferring
A close up of the panl at right . there is a tuning knob at the right , a fine tuning in middle and the volume control .ALso a tone switch an a light switch
What I liked with this radio, it has a 'analogue' volume control that behaves differently than the 380 and is close to 360
AM Filters & tuning : there is a series of filters of 2.3 /3.5 / 5 and 9 kHz which are close to the PL380 of 1 /2 3 and 6 kHz respectively in terms if audio fidelity
- Bandwidths can be changed in htse 3 ways :
- Using the b/w switch The filters are changed in a up and down style ie start from low to hi then high to low and vice versa !
- Using the freq switch
- Using the fine tune switch
- Fine tuning is to 1 kHz
- Notice that changing the freq in either tuning knob there is some 0.1-0.3 sec latency (blank audio )
SSB:
- In SSB the filters use nearly the half of the bandwidth e 0.5 /1,2 /2.3/3.0/4 kHz
- The manner to change the bandwidths ar the same with AM
- Fine tuning is to 0.01 kHz
- Here is a ‘but’ in the situation : the filters of 3 and 4 kHz don’t have any significant difference in audio fidelity and are close if not lower to 2 kHz !!
- Though not easily recognized there is a shift
from the exact freq by 130 HZ in both sidebands . ECSS (fine tuning) to
an Am signal )seems to operate properly .There is a technique to
adjust it via the table provided n he separate sheet
SYNCHRO :
- Synch is a special feature thought not operating properly in cases that the signals have strong fading and a buzzer is quite apparent but locks quite well to the signal (even with more than 200 Hz there is no shift to audio )
- Once I tested the synchro feature in a SSB signal : ther result was a totally garbled sound
- I prefer to use the ECSS technique (using the SSB totune ). It works much better for listening to signals more stable
FM reception and usage :
- The FM tune knob has a 0.1 MHZ step and the fine tune knob uses 10 kHz
- The BW filter is the standard of all Silicon based radios , I think it is ca 200 kHz
- The audio is pretty good but is a little less than the 380’s fidelity if using earphones
- Reception is ca the same with PL380 . But there is a very nice advantage :the audio level of the very poor signals is the same with the strong signals , in contrast to the PL3x0 series
- Attenuator operates also in this band
- This is the only Filter. I could prefer to see a narrower filter !
- Earphone cable can affect reception . IN several cases also the hand over the radio can enhance reception of low signals . But detaching the antenna to its ful length can restore to better reception
MW reception and usage :
- Slightly better sensitivity over PL380 : tested in various frequencies (1503 810 and 567 )
- There are no problems with self images as in PL380 that occur in several important Greek freqs as 1404 or 729 but still there are some carriers in other frequencies
- Attenuator operates in this bands too
- Synch also works in this band
LW
- IN contrast to PL600 ,and PL380 the 880 excels in reception on nights with clear signals even if the band is attenuated for more than 20 db in between 160-200. One of the nicest operations of this radio
- Attenuator does affect the band a bit but not so much as in other bands
- Seen a fall of sensitivity in the range of 160-200 kHz. Just a few kHz and the radio's sensitivity restores
Shortwaves :
- NO overloads even using the 16 H antenna connected to the radio of the antenna on local nights
- Operates properly with the mag loop via the 3.9mm antenna plug
- Once you change a band the last freqs remain of the band
- I found several carriers
Speaker : The 880 is bassier than the 380 (380 is heard very sharp comparing to 380 , as the DE17 is heard comparing to PL380)
The reasons (downs):
- could prefer the filters to be exact (unless the filters on the 380 ar more wide than the displayed!!)
- the SSB modes have correct filtering eg 4kHz to operate as 4khz (and better audio correspondingly)
- a second narrower FM filter could be a nice addition esp fr the FM DXers
- as for the synch is quite known problem also mentioned in the yahoo group quite much (?)
- the
high internal noise herd in all the bands (possibly problem from the
internal analog circuitry this happens also to the MW reception of the
PL380 )
- No SW overloads even the radio's antenna is connected to the external antenna
- Nice FM audio normalization on all stations from the soft tune (something the very cheap De 17 has also for the SW)
- Good LW reception better comparing to the vacancy of PL 600 and 380
If you are member of the yahoo group https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Tecsun_PL-880 you
can search some interesting material on the files including spectrum
analysis for SSB and ECSS reception . I will not include any photos here
It also includes the sheet with the hidden operations
BTW the hidden features are as follows:
- Adjustable FM De-emphasis (no audio difference )
- Adjustable Line-Out Level
- Adjusting Muting Threshold
- Battery low voltage shutdown
- Digital Noise Reduction
- Force Receiver to accept LW/MW antennas into the external SW antenna jack (a complex 7-step process)
- MW and SSB Calibration
- Radio Run time
- Seconds on/off for clock
My near mint 880 suddenly stopped receiving SW signals! A New Zealander who describes the same problem found out and solved his. A rather delicate repair for the non-technical. It is a shame of Tecsun 880.
ReplyDelete